Monday, May 7, 2007

Environmental Health in China from a Tradtional Perspective


The history of China is wrought with wars, droughts, famines, and rising and fallings' of empires, all of which took a toll on China's environment. Behind China's environmental history lie China's main schools of thought; Confucianism, Taoism, and Legalism. Confucianism is highly structured and stresses the value of morality, propriety, and social harmony1.

Early Confucianism regarded nature as an uncontrollable force to be conquered. For instance, it supported the idea that, “Man could not stop the coming of winter.” However later Confucian followers, as early as 400 B.C., evolved to believe that by appreciating nature’s laws, man could overcome nature’s superiority and use it for his benefit , If you were to, “Plant your crops according to the changes of season, you [would] have more food than you want[ed].”

Taoists held a more free-spirited train of thought. The Taoist credo was “Let nature take its course! Be yourself! Relax and enjoy life!” Taoism’s lack of structure therefore supported simple living and protected the environment. Unfortunately, it was Taoists’ beliefs that stunted economic development and social progress.

The Legalism school of thought perceived the need for stringent controls and rules to support the growth of China’s population and to address the growing scarcity of food and resources. Legalism was incorporated under the Qin dynasty and established a system of rewards and punishments to encourage appropriate behavior1.

All in all, Confucianism, Taoism, and Legalism collectively appreciated and respected nature. However, the dominating school of thought throughout the majority of China’s history has been the Confucian belief in man’s capability to use nature to carry out his needs that has led to the environmental issues china now faces.

Sunday, April 15, 2007

Ethics in Global Health


From abortion rights to environmental protection, ethical issues regarding global health are becoming increasingly more complex. A problem in ethical consideration is that it is highly subjective, there is no right or wrong answer in most cases. Please perform this exercise by answering the two questions to have a better understanding of what I mean.

Is it okay to steal?
-You probably answered "no", the issue seems essentially black and white.

However, if I rephrase the question.

Is it okay to steal food if you're family's life depends on it?
-All of a sudden an easily answerable question becomes seemingly unanswerable.

One person's response to the second question may be highly variable from another person. Some factors that influence our responses include; ethnicity,culture, religious background, upbringing, education, personality, exposure, wants and needs. Other factors may include genetics and other environmental influence.

Good ethical decisions, as described by Gurinder Shahi, are based on reason, take into account established ethical principles, based on consensus, take into account those without voice (minority, environment, unborn fetus), and are open to change in the face of new understanding and experience.

In the face of global economic development and scientific advancement the next few decades promise to hold interesting and highly controversial issues. From stem-cell research to weapon development, these issues will affect people throughout the world. For this reason more countries and international organizations should be concerned with developing a global ethics organization. A specific mechanism for weighing out ethical issues, creating global legislation, and most importantly a method to enforce ethics adherence is necessary to ensure the avoidance of moral chaos.

Sunday, April 8, 2007

Global Health and Corporate Involvement


The advent of the internet along with growth in international trade has made our world increasingly dependent on "inter-economies." Inter-economies are product enterprises between any number of countries that require a specific resource or service from each. For example, a company that produces syringes in the United States may be reliant on another company who mines metal in South America. This type of inter-economy reliance illustrates the need and importance of corporate support for global health. Following the example above, if the company that mines metal for the syringe company in U.S. is devastated by a multi-drug resistant strain of tuberculosis, the U.S. company's productivity may slow or even stop until a new source for the metals could be found. For this reason corporations should more involved in global health. By helping to establish health care and/or organizations that address health issues in other countries corporations are essentially investing in their own economic security. Besides this business incentive for corporations, they may also boast their efforts to improve global health to improve their corporate image. Therefore, not only will investment in global health ensure economic security and a positive social image for the corporation but it will improve health throughout the world and promote global economic development.

Friday, March 23, 2007

Global Health Monitoring: Grassroots or International


One challenging obstacle in global health progress is that it needs more accurate monitoring and recording methods for collecting health data. International standards often don't accurately measure health statistics in different regions. Another issue to global monitoring is, some regions don't recognize certain diseases like the psychological diseases,(i.e. ADHD and chronic fatigue syndrome). Cultural and societal norms make developing global monitoring standards extremely difficult.
In 2002 an interesting approach to monitoring and assessing population health was developed in China. The goal of the study was to develop an indicator list to effectively and efficiently monitor and assess reproductive health through urban and rural China. An issue health officials had been facing was that the international standard indicator list, created by the WHO, wasn't effectively working. The study approach to make a more effective monitoring method involved two groups, nominal and delphi. The nominal group was made up of expert grassroots reproductive health officials and providers from the local and provincial. The delphi group was made up of national and international experts on reproductive health. In the first step of development the nominal groups met and created a list of what indicators were most important to their region. The first step led to a list of more than a hundred indicators to help monitor reproductive help. In the next step the delphi group was given the nominal group's long list and they were asked to rank their perceived importance of each indicator. An abridged list was created and then redistributed back to the delphi group to make an even more concise list. In the end the list came to include 21 indicators specifically relevant to assessing China's reproductive health. Field tests proved that by combining grassroots and international expertise they were able to make a more effective and efficient health monitoring method. This approach may be a guide for other developing countries so that they may make monitoring systems that are tailored toward their populations which are more effective and efficient than standards developed by international health organizations.

Thursday, March 8, 2007

Emergence of and Innovations in Disease Management

The following two clips are from a compilation my colleague Lawrence Ham and I put together. Please check them out and feel free to comment. I'll give more on my personal opinions in disease management in the near future.
Part 1

Part 2

Wednesday, February 28, 2007

The Bigger Challenge

A large portion of global health's scope, and what I will focus on in this entry, pertains to the elimination of infectious diseases through effective vaccination of vulnerable, and in some cases, entire populations. Obviously, a large obstacle to vaccinating people is first, developing a vaccine, but it has recently come to global health and biomedical engineer officials' attention that there may be a bigger challenges.

The bigger challenge may be covert, only showing its face after the development of a vaccine, whereas another challenge may be more overt and be easily identified. An example of an easily identifiable overt challenge faces the development of an HIV vaccination for Africans in the Sub-Saharan. The challenge to biomedical engineers and scientists would be to develop a vaccine in which the immunogens won't denature in warm weather or to develop a protective method for transporting the vaccine during a hot day. This is only one example ,however, there may be numerous other challenges regarding vaccination methods when applied in massive populations. For these reasons it is becoming increasingly more apparent that scientists developing not only vaccines, but also drugs and therapies, while working in concert with biomedical engineers and global health officials so that they may coordinate effective health technologies and strategies for addressing global health issues.

Tuesday, February 20, 2007

The Truth

I find it disturbing that as United States citizens we can't rely on popular press for our news. As my colleague Farah Karahpeni comments in her post Public Health in Palestine (http://farahonhealth.blogspot.com/), we are typically only given one side of the story and it's usually the side most convenient for our government. The war in the middle east between the Israelis and the Palestinians is the best example of how by the time we get our news from the popular press it has been so filtered and polluted with bias that it can't be trusted. The Israeli government continues to oppress the Palestinians so much that regular people are being driven to fanaticism, the same fanaticism our news uses to associate negative thoughts with Muslims.

The middle east is just a small example in the midst of a sea of issues we are typically misinformed about. Just recently I watched the documentary, "An Inconvenient Truth," presented by Al Gore. The documentary opened my eyes to how much the government and industry skew what we're told through popular press so that we fall into a state of doubt and skepticism which leads to inaction. "An Inconvenient Truth" describes the past, present, and future of global warming. If Al Gore's information is true our country and world has a huge problem on its hands. With the polar ice caps melting and oceans warming mankind may have to face a whole new set of environmental problems. If you haven't seen, "An Inconvenient Truth," I would highly recommend it. It will open your eyes to the issue of global warming and hopefully make you a little less vulnerable to biased popular press and news media.

(For a little fun, check out my friends "Go Green" video).